{ "version": "https://jsonfeed.org/version/1", "title": "eay.cc", "description": "Weblog von Stefan Grund", "home_page_url": "https://eay.cc", "feed_url": "https://eay.cc/2013/jeff-jarvis-fordert-hippokratischen-eid-fuer-informatiker/feed/json", "icon": "https://eay.cc/apple-touch-icon.png", "favicon": "https://eay.cc/favicon.ico", "author": { "name": "Stefan Grund", "url": "https://stefangrund.de/", "avatar": "https://stefangrund.de/avatar.jpg" }, "items": [ { "id": "26412", "_type": "link", "url": "https://eay.cc/2013/jeff-jarvis-fordert-hippokratischen-eid-fuer-informatiker/", "title": "Jeff Jarvis fordert Hippokratischen Eid f\u00fcr Informatiker", "content_html": "

Link \u2192

Computer and data scientists are the nuclear scientists of our age, proprietors of technology that can be used for good or ill. They must write their own set of principles, governing not the actions of government\u00b4s spies but their own use of power when they are asked by those spies and governments \u00e2\u0080\u0094 as well as their own employers \u00e2\u0080\u0094 to violate our privacy or use our own information against our best interests or hamper and chill our speech. They must decide what goes too far. They must answer that question above \u00e2\u0080\u0094 whose side are you on? I suggest a technologists\u00b4 Hippocratic oath: First, harm no users.

\n

(Den \u00fcbersetzten Text gibt’s auch auf der Webseite einer \u00fcberregionalen deutschen Wochenzeitung, aber wenn ich daraus einen Absatz zitiere, nehmen die mir nachher – Stichwort Leistungsschutzrecht – noch Haus und Hof weg.)

\n

Update, 19.12.: Hier noch ein bisschen LSR-Follow-Up.

\n\"\"", "date_published": "2013-12-17T12:57:33+00:00", "date_modified": "2013-12-18T23:09:57+00:00", "author": { "name": "Stefan" }, "tags": [ "jeff jarvis", "nsa", "technologie", "\u00fcberwachung", "usa" ], "_short_url": "https://eay.li/2at", "external_url": "http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/dec/09/tech-giant-companies-open-letter-white-house" } ] }